Skip to main content

BOOK REVIEW - INSIDE THE PRESIDENCY



GENRE: POLITICS.

AUTHOR: DICKSON JERE.

SETTING: ZAMBIA (2008 – 2011; RUPIAH BWEZANI BANDA’S PRESIDENCY).

PUBLISHER: NSEMIA INC. PUBLISHERS.

PUBLICATION DATE: APRIL 2012.

EDITION: FIRST.

PAGES: 237

SPECIAL FEATURES: PICTURES

PRICE: KES 1,000.

ISBN: 978-1-926906-36-2

So, Rupiah Banda loses his presidency in one of the greatest upsets in African Political History, despite his massive development track record.

The book is a very interesting read for minds passionate about the inner workings of an African government, pre, during and post-election.

The author, Dickson Jere, is a Zambian lawyer, journalist, published author and renowned political analyst specializing on African affairs. The accounts in this book are from his time as the senior Advisor and Spokesman for the 4th Zambian State President, Mr. Rupiah Banda.

The book gives a well transitioned chronology of events leading from Rupiah’s ‘rise to grace’, his presidency in general and consequently, his democratic fall.

We must recognize however, that Mr. Rupiah Bwezani Banda (RB) is a respected Zambian statesman and well renown all over Africa and the world. More so, according to Dickson Jere (DJ), probably one of the best presidents Zambia ever had.

DJ, in his account, concedes that he and his state-house colleagues were partly to blame for RB’s loss in the September, 2011 election. This review seeks to discuss all the ‘mistakes’ made by RB, the captain, and his team, as well as translate them into contemporary African politics, Kenya being a key reference point.

As sure as the sun, politics is a game of wolves feigning gentleman behavior. To win, those are the players that must play and that is how it must be played. In general, gentlemen always finish last. In view of DJ’s account, RB was a very fine gentleman – the general underlying mistake! It is okay to be a wolf. In fact, most beloved and winning presidents are, case in point, Abraham Lincoln. 

A closer look into his life reveals that the man was far from perfect. After all, “Men judge generally more by the eye than by the hand, for everyone can see and few can feel. Everyone sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are,” Niccolo Machiavelli.

Michael Chilufya Sata of the Patriotic Front (PF), who beat RB to become the 5th president, did not have a Bachelor’s degree. Earlier on, during the pre-election period, the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD) wanted parliament to amend the constitution and introduce a clause that required the Head of State, be a university degree holder; an opinion that had gained traction even with other opposition parties other than the PF. 

RB’s team developed a proposal for his approval which he blatantly rubbished, paving way for Sata to contest and later win – three grievous mistakes all equal in nature.

San Tzu, believed author of ‘The Art of War’, a book at the center of numerous winning formulae, articulates that a general must be allowed to act freely in the best interest of their master and explain their actions later when the war is won. Hitler’s generals were not allowed to act freely and this resulted in the successful allied invasion at Normandy. DJ and team were not allowed to act freely. 

September 14th 2017; Ngujiri Wambugu, a ruling party member of parliament, files a motion to oust the Chief Justice on account of ‘malpractice’. A move widely speculated to be a counter-measure for the Judiciary’s perceived ‘favoritism’ of the opposition. 

To many, by the time his captain, the president, feigning gentleman behavior, instructs him to withdraw the motion, it has already served its purpose and the message to the judiciary is clear; you are not untouchable! The build-up to the presidential candidates only election is then preview to a more ‘fair’ judiciary in terms of rulings.

An option is only as good as its demonstrated potential. DJ and team should have influenced the MMD to table the motion requiring the president be a university degree holder in parliament. Not only did the MMD have numbers, but also the support of other opposition parties – they would have easily made the motion law. 

Had the generals been free to act, RB should only have been notified of proceedings and his input demanded where necessary. Further, had RB seen the motions potential while already in parliament, he would most likely had approved it. 

It is relatively easier to show a man the way to go exactly when he is at a cross-road than to explain to him which road to go before he reaches the cross-road or even begins the journey.

Niccolo Machiavelli, in his book, ‘The Prince’, renown for political strategy, depicts that the opportunity to win must be taken forthwith; without hesitation. An opportunity presented itself to legally remove the worthiest opponent from the race but it was overlooked by the captain, RB, and it cost him his presidency. 

The PF on the other hand, equally got a chance to legally eliminate their worthiest opponent, RB, and they jump on it like angry swarm of bees. They went to court and unsuccessfully argued that RB was not of original Zambian origin as required by Zambian law for one to be president. 

In election management, everything that should not be left to chance, should not. RB leaves it to the Zambians to decide on whether or not they want an educated president. In the true spirit of the political game, such a decision should have been made for them.

As we proceed, ideally, any given head of state as well doubles up as the leader of the political party that either sponsors or fronts him. This means that he is both responsible for state as well as party affairs. Neglect for one in favor of the other is highly risky. 

RB was comparatively more involved in state affairs as compared to party affairs – he rarely even held party meetings let alone meet party officials. As a result, loyalty towards him within the party wavered and members begun to disintegrate, finally costing him the election. 

In Kenya, the Jubilee administration has struck a ‘masterpiece’ balance. In every social state affair such as the building of roads or rail, the party always finds a way of strategic inclusion. 

In addition, whenever the president wishes to successfully pass a certain motion through parliament, he personally meets and rallies the members of parliament allied to his party. This not only keeps them motivated but also brings them closer to the president.

As if not enough, the president directly makes another colossal mistake. Again, in his gentleman nature, to protect old friends, he personally ensures their nominations unopposed in the party primaries. The more popular candidates are either intimidated to step down or are forced out of the party. 

Most of them who felt they had been treated unfairly, immediately shifted their support in favor of Sata. In the end, the president is seriously hammered in his own strongholds. 

In April 2017, the Kenyan president chooses to support Charles Njagua alias ‘Jaguar’, a popular musician and electoral candidate in the party’s Starehe constituency primaries. This is after a long-standing friend of the president, Maina Kamanda, supposedly rigged Jaguar out. 

So, Kamanda’s win is withdrawn and the nomination certificate handed to Jaguar – the president reaps big on the massive voter support. In politics, there is no such thing as loyalty when voter support is at stake.

DJ also makes his own mistakes out of fear of indictment either by the president or the president’s other staff. He fails to act on numerous occasions where the would-be beneficiary is the president. He once personally called for the release of the former spy chief from prison in order for him (the spy chief) to seek medical treatment. 

He did this without authority from the president. At first, he is ridiculed, however, in the end, his actions win the president praise for being humane. This should have been his resolve going forward. 

The job is strictly to protect the president; not to always tell him how or when it is happening.
In conclusion, the mistakes committed by the president and his team should be observed more closely and avoided in future by both presidents and aspirants looking to win presidential elections.

Aaron Ogunde





Comments

Popular Posts

Living as a 'Burden' to society

The society should not view us as a burden Children with different abilities bear weights that they should not have to. One unacquainted journalist recently asked me during an interview, “were you, or are you a burden to your parents?” In the interest of self-control, suitable replies to the overly insensitive question raced through my mind. “Why don’t you ask my parents!”, I thought to myself. The more I thought of what to answer the more painful it became. It then dawned on me that this was actually the reality of children with different abilities. We are viewed as a burden to society, throughout the course of our lives. There I was, all grown up, comfortably capable of checking myself into such interviews, a graduate nonetheless, and yet, the same prejudice still plagued me. Tears flowed as I attempted to answer her question. I recently visited a well-known children’s home that has hosted children with different abilities for decades. They were in the process o...

A girl can say no.

A girl can say no. A girl can say no. Whether to gifts or advances from suitors. She has every right to do so. To be killed for exercising that right is detrimental to the societal gains made since independence. Likewise, a boy can try and fail. If he fails, he must do so with honour and dignity. Sadly, we have been waking up to one case after the other, of brutally murdered women. The common culprit: an estranged ‘lover’. Perhaps of more concern, millennials seem to be the most affected. A few days ago, a young doctor was killed. Her apparent crime: saying no to a man. A man who had allegedly given her all manner of gifts and incentives to say yes. The same man suspected of killing her. Worse still, bloggers went on to post unverified claims. That she was killed because she infected the man. Even if it is indeed true, it is a very foolish way of looking at things. HIV/AIDS is not a new topic. Particularly, here in Kenya. It has even been declared as a national di...

Dealing with Gambling Match-Fixing and connected social issues in Kenya.

Match-fixing is a rampant vice that is quickly destroying sportsmanship.   Recently, the international football governing body, FIFA, acknowledged it was currently investigating a Harambee Stars player. His ‘sin’: participation in match-fixing.  Failure to halt match-fixing, will always leave the questions: ‘did we really win?’ or ‘did we really lose?’. Where is the entertainment in that?  Dealing with match-fixing requires understanding why it persists, especially as a recluse of cartels. Online betting An article in the Daily Nation by Vincent Opiyo expounded on how cartels benefit from match-fixing. They benefit mostly due to their involvement with or ownership of betting firms. The more the people lose bets as a result of fixed matches, the more money they make.  Worse still, the more the gamblers lose, the higher the urge to bet even more.  In part, this is due to the promise of heaven-on-earth wins in daily advertisements. To deal with matc...